Russia’s media regulator accuses Wikipedia of information attacks on Russians — RT EN

5 Apr 2022 1:36 pm

The Russian media regulator has asked the online encyclopedia Wikipedia to remove content containing “unreliable information” about Russia’s actions in Ukraine and the actions of the Russian military, at the request of prosecutors.

Source: © NurPhoto

The Russian media regulator Roskomnadzor published a corresponding request on Telegram on Tuesday. Accordingly, it is about content that spreads “unreliable, socially significant information” about Russia’s actions in Ukraine and the actions of the Russian armed forces. The authority accused the online encyclopedia of depicting an exclusively anti-Russian interpretation of the events. There are complaints about the articles “Battle for Kyiv (2022)”, “War crimes during the Russian invasion of Ukraine”, “Bombardment of a hospital in Mariupol”, “Destruction of the Mariupol Theater (2022)” and “Massacre in Bucha”.

The media regulator asked Wikipedia to remove such content. Otherwise there is a fine of up to four million rubles (around 43,500 euros). Roskomnadzor had repeatedly warned Wikipedia of a possible blocking. Due to fears of a ban, the Internet archives in Russia are currently being downloaded more and more. For example, downloads of the program Kiwix, which allows Wikipedia to be read offline, increased 50-fold in the first days of March, a company representative told the Russian newspaper Kommersant.

More on the subject – Russia: Newspaper Novaya Gazeta, which is critical of the Kremlin, temporarily stops working

By blocking RT, the EU aims to silence a critical, non-pro-Western source of information. And not only with regard to the Ukraine war. Access to our website has been made more difficult, several social media have blocked our accounts. It is now up to all of us whether journalism beyond mainstream narratives can continue to be pursued in Germany and the EU. If you like our articles, feel free to share them wherever you are active. It’s possible because the EU hasn’t banned our work or reading and sharing our articles.

Source link